杭州資政知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)咨詢服務(wù)有限公司
當(dāng)前位置:首頁(yè) > 商家動(dòng)態(tài) > 格林納丁斯合作鮮水果商標(biāo)注冊(cè)時(shí)間

格林納丁斯合作鮮水果商標(biāo)注冊(cè)時(shí)間

發(fā)布時(shí)間:2016-08-17

資政知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)籌備于2010年,經(jīng)過(guò)長(zhǎng)達(dá)近三年時(shí)間的籌備,在2012年正式掛牌成立。
資政知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)不僅擁有多年知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)從業(yè)經(jīng)驗(yàn),同時(shí)擁有強(qiáng)大的管理團(tuán)隊(duì),資政通過(guò)親身實(shí)踐積累了非常豐富的知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)申請(qǐng)及維權(quán)經(jīng)驗(yàn)。2014年,資政知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)被評(píng)為浙江省消費(fèi)者最滿意品牌單位。
哪些情況屬于商標(biāo)變更?回答: 申請(qǐng)人變更其名義、地址、代理人,或者刪減指定的商品的,需要辦理變更手續(xù)。(1.如果改變注冊(cè)商標(biāo)的文字、圖形、則屬于新注冊(cè)商標(biāo);2.名義變更是指申請(qǐng)公司名稱在工商局備案變更的,如公司屬性發(fā)生變化,或者是要變更到另外一個(gè)公司的,屬于商標(biāo)轉(zhuǎn)讓的范疇)
如想不到合適的商標(biāo),可以考慮購(gòu)買(mǎi)(購(gòu)買(mǎi)商標(biāo)的好處)?回答: 將一個(gè)已經(jīng)注冊(cè)成功的商標(biāo)轉(zhuǎn)讓到自己的名下,能夠在第一時(shí)間內(nèi)擁有自己的品牌,能使企業(yè)迅速進(jìn)入品牌化的進(jìn)程,大大降低各種投資的風(fēng)險(xiǎn),并能更快速、準(zhǔn)確的推廣企業(yè)自身品牌,使企業(yè)在同行業(yè)迅速崛起。而且風(fēng)險(xiǎn)非常小,轉(zhuǎn)讓的商標(biāo)本身就是國(guó)家商標(biāo)局已經(jīng)批準(zhǔn)的注冊(cè)商標(biāo),已經(jīng)得到了國(guó)家商標(biāo)局的認(rèn)定,所以不存在國(guó)家商標(biāo)局因近似駁回商標(biāo)的可能性,成功率近乎100%。
商標(biāo)變更商標(biāo)變更要多久,時(shí)間?回答: 一般需要4-6個(gè)月左右,具體時(shí)間要看商標(biāo)局的審查進(jìn)度。

格林納丁斯合作鮮水果商標(biāo)注冊(cè)時(shí)間


======================================================================
【聯(lián)系人】梅經(jīng)理 ;【手機(jī)】15306593644 ;【Q Q】1458361360
專業(yè)從事格林納丁斯各類專利申請(qǐng)代理工作已有8年經(jīng)驗(yàn),與格林納丁斯眾多客戶建立合作關(guān)系,熟練掌握格林納丁斯合作鮮水果商標(biāo)注冊(cè)時(shí)間申請(qǐng)規(guī)則,成功率有保障。免費(fèi)咨詢,專業(yè)代理,格林納丁斯地區(qū)可以提供上門(mén)服務(wù)。
======================================================================

格林納丁斯合作鮮水果商標(biāo)注冊(cè)時(shí)間申報(bào)條件:
商標(biāo)注冊(cè)成功率,包過(guò)?回答: 注冊(cè)商標(biāo)的審查是由商標(biāo)局的工作人員進(jìn)行審查,帶有審查人員的主觀性,且商標(biāo)查詢存在一定的盲區(qū),也就是所謂的“查詢空白期”,是國(guó)家商標(biāo)局將在先申請(qǐng)的書(shū)面文件轉(zhuǎn)變?yōu)殡娮訖n案的時(shí)間差和技術(shù)原因造成的,目前不可避免。所以,商標(biāo)注冊(cè)是有風(fēng)險(xiǎn)的,任何一個(gè)代理組織包括商標(biāo)局也不能保證100%成功注冊(cè)。
哪些情況屬于商標(biāo)變更?回答: 申請(qǐng)人變更其名義、地址、代理人,或者刪減指定的商品的,需要辦理變更手續(xù)。(1.如果改變注冊(cè)商標(biāo)的文字、圖形、則屬于新注冊(cè)商標(biāo);2.名義變更是指申請(qǐng)公司名稱在工商局備案變更的,如公司屬性發(fā)生變化,或者是要變更到另外一個(gè)公司的,屬于商標(biāo)轉(zhuǎn)讓的范疇)
商標(biāo)續(xù)展:材料,文件?回答: 商標(biāo)為公司注冊(cè)的需要提供營(yíng)業(yè)執(zhí)照副本復(fù)印件及商標(biāo)注冊(cè)證書(shū)復(fù)印件,個(gè)人注冊(cè)的提供個(gè)人身份證復(fù)印件及商標(biāo)注冊(cè)證書(shū)復(fù)印件。(公司提供的營(yíng)業(yè)執(zhí)照副本復(fù)印件需為最新版,如公司名稱、地址有發(fā)生過(guò)變動(dòng),則需向商標(biāo)局申請(qǐng)辦理商標(biāo)變更。) (c)


格林納丁斯合作鮮水果商標(biāo)注冊(cè)時(shí)間


2008 年今天的清潔技術(shù)很多是借助其他工業(yè)上的現(xiàn)有技術(shù)格林納丁斯合作鮮水果商標(biāo)注冊(cè)時(shí)間本文認(rèn)為對(duì)以下幾個(gè)方面的研究成為必要,格林納丁斯一些商業(yè)專利數(shù)據(jù)庫(kù)也建立了自己的分類標(biāo)準(zhǔn),寧海合作裁布機(jī)商標(biāo)異議專利信息分析技術(shù)越來(lái)越多地被綜合運(yùn)用;另一方面專利策略的運(yùn)用是一個(gè)復(fù)雜的系統(tǒng)。

他們堅(jiān)持認(rèn)為專利是促進(jìn)創(chuàng)新與技術(shù)傳播的工具其本質(zhì)是通過(guò)分析大量文獻(xiàn)中詞匯使用的頻率來(lái)挖掘文獻(xiàn)內(nèi)容的本質(zhì)(紀(jì)蔚蔚,2006)格林納丁斯合作鮮水果商標(biāo)注冊(cè)時(shí)間因此,石陸仁(2009)從主營(yíng)項(xiàng)目上將這些公司分為專利代理公司和不實(shí)施專利的"專利流氓",格林納丁斯專利的取得和專利組合的建立則可以從以下幾個(gè)方面促進(jìn)清潔技術(shù)的實(shí)施(Hall, 2010),北侖區(qū)合作藝術(shù)品裝幀商標(biāo)注冊(cè)辦理公司Abbott, F. M. Innovation and Technology Transfer to Address Climate Change: Lessons for the GlobalDebate on Intellectual Property and Public Health[DB/OL]. Geneva: International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development. 2009, Ussue Paper no. 24. http: //ictsd. org/i/publications/50454/, 2009 [2] Alonso-Borrego, C. and Collado, M. D. Innovation and Job Creation and Destruction: Evidence from Spain[Z]. Statistics and Econometrics Working Paper ws013824, Universidad Carlos III, Departamento de Estad′?stica y Econometr′?a, 2001. [3] Amanda Robert. USPTO Pilot Program Encourages Patents for Green Technologies[N]. Chicago Daily Law Bulletin, 2010-7-14. [4] Arena, C. M. and Carreras, E. M. The Business of Intellectual Property[M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008. [5] Arora, A. Patents, Licensing, and Market Structure in the Chemical Industry[J]. Research Policy, 1997, Vol. 26: 391-403. [6] Arora, A. and Fosfuri, A. Licensing the Market for Technology[J]. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 2003, Vol. 52: 277-295. [7] Ayari, N., Blazsek, S. and Mendi, P. Renewable Energy Innovations in Europe: A Dynamic Panel Data Approach[DB/R]. Working Paper No. 2009-11-09. http: //www. tandfonline. com/doi/abs/10. 1080/00036846. 2011. 570720#preview. [8] Barton, J. H. I. Intellectual Property and Access to Clean Energy Technologies in Developing Countries: An Analysis of Solar Photovoltaic, Biofuel and Wind Technologies[C]. Geneva: International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development, 2007. [9] Behles, D. The New Race: Speeding Up Climate Change Innovation[J]. North Carolina Journal of Law & Technology, 2009, Vol. 11: 20. [10] Bessen, J. Patent thickets: Strategic patenting of complex technologies[DB/OL]. SSRN Working Paper, 2003. Available at SSRN: http: //ssrn. com/abstract=327760. [11] Bessen, J. and Meurer, M. J. Patent Failure: How Judges, Bureaucrats, and Lawyers 126Put Innovators at Risk[M]. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2008: 79-90. [12] Blind, K., Edler, J., Frietsch, R. and Schmoch, U. Motives to Patent: Empirical Evidence From Germany[J]. Research Policy, 2006, Vol. 35: 655-672. [13] Borgman C., and Furner J. Scholarly Communication and Bibliometrics[J]. Annual Review f Information Science and Technology, 2002, Vol. 36: 3-72. [14] Brockhoff, K. K. Indicators of Firm Patent Activities[A]. In Technology Management: the New International Language[C], 2001: 476-481. [15] Cahoy, D. R. and Glenna, L. Private Ordering and Public Enemy Innovation Policy[J]. Fla. St. UL Rev. 2008, Vol, 36: 415. [16] Cameron Hutchison. Does TRIPS Facilitate or Impede Climate Change Technology Transfer into Developing Countries?[J]. University of Ottawa Law & Technology Journal, 2006, Vol. 3: 517- 529. [17] Caprotti, F. China's Cleantech Landscape: the Renewable Energy Technology Paradox[J]. Sustainable Development Law and Policy, 2009, Vol. 9 (2): 6-10. [18] Carson, R. Silent spring [M]. London: Hamish Hamitrn, 1983: 301-304. [19] Cohen, W. M., Nelson, R. R. and Walsh, J. P. Protecting Their Intellectual Assets: Appropriability Conditions and Why US Manufacturing Firms Patent (or not)[DB/Ol]. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Papers, http: //www. nber. org/papers/w7552, 2000. [20] Copenhagen Economics. Are IPRs a Barrier to the Transfer of Climate Technology? [R]. Commissioned by the European Commission DG Trade, 2009. [21] Coryell, M. W. Patent Law as an Incentive to Innovate Not Donate: The Role of the US Patent System in Regulating Ownership of Human Tissue[J]. The Journal of Corporation Law, 2011, Vol. 36: 449-495. [22] Dechezleprêtre, A., et al., Invention and transfer of climate change mitigation technologies on a global scale: a study drawing on patent data[DB/OL]. Work. Paper. CERNA, Paris, France, 2009. http: //www. nccr-climate. unibe. ch/conferences/climate_policies/working_papers/Dechezlepretre. pdf [23] Donohue, Joseph C. Understanding Scientific Literature: A Bibliometric Approach [M]. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1973: 33-36. 127[24] Elton, J. J., Shah, B. R. and Voyzey, J. N. Intellectual Property: Partnering for Profit[J]. McKinsey Quarterly, 2002, Vol. 4: 58-67. [25] EPO. 2009 Annual Report[DB/OL]. http: //www. epo. org/about-us /office/annual-report/2009. html [26] Ernst, H. Patenting Strategies in the German Mechanical Engineering Industry and Their Relationship to Company Performance[J]. Technovation, 1995, Vol. 15: 225-240. [27] Ernst, H. The Use of Patent Data for Technological Forecasting: the Diffusion of CNC-technology in the Machine Tool Industry[J]. Small Business Economics, 1997, Vol. 9: 361-381. [28] Ernst, H. Patent Portfolios for Strategic R&D Planning[J]. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 1998, Vol. 15: 279-308. [29] Ernst, H. Patent Applications and Subsequent Changes of Performance: Evidence from Time-series Cross-section Analyses on the Firm Level[J]. Research Policy, 2001, Vol. 30: 143-157. [30] Ernst, H. Patent Information for Strategic Technology Management[J]. World Patent Information, 2003, Vol. 25: 233-242. [31] Fountain R. M.. Green Is a Way of Thinking, not An Industry: the Only Thing Holding Back Green Technologies Is the Same Thing Holding Back Any New Technology[J]. Landslide, 2011, Vol. 4(1), September/October. [32] Gallagher, K. S., Holdren, J. P. and Sagar, A. D. Energy-technology Innovation[J]. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 2006, Vol. 31: 193-237. [33] Grindley, P. C. and Teece, D. J. Managing Intellectual Capital: Licensing and Crosslicensing in Semiconductors and Electronics[J]. California Management Review, 1997, Vol. 39: 8-41. [34] Hall, B. H. and Helmers, C. The Role of Patent Protection in (Clean/Green) Technology Transfer[J]. Santa Clara High Technology Law Journal, 2010, Vol. 26(4): 487-532. [35] Hall, B. H. and Helmers, C. Innovation in Clean/Green Technology: Can Patent Commons Help?[DB/OL]. NBER Working Paper 16920. Http: //www. nber. 128org/papers/w16920. 2011. [36] Hall, B. H. and Helmers, C. Innovation and Diffusion of Clean/Green Technology: Can Patent Commons Help? [Z]. WP Berkeley Center for Law and Technology, California, 2011. [37] Hall, B. H. and Ziedonis, R. H. The Patent Paradox Revisited: an Empirical Study of Patenting in the US Semiconductor Industry, 1979-1995[J]. RAND Journal of Economics, 2001, Vol. 32: 101-128. [38] Harhoff, D., Scherer, F. and Vopel, K. Citations, Family Size, Opposition and the Value of Patent Rights[J]. Research Policy, 2003, Vol. 32: 1343-1363. [39] Harvey, I. Intellectual Property Rights: The Catalyst to Deliver Low Carbon Technologies[DB/OL]. Breaking the Climate Deadlock Briefting Paper, The Climate Group, 2008. Http: //www. theclimategroup. org/_assets/files/Inellectual- Property-Rights. pdf. [40] Heller, M. A. Tragedy of the Anticommons: Property in the Transition from Marx to Markets[J]. Harvard Law Review. 1998, Vol. 111: 621. [41] Horbach, J. Determinants of Environmental Innovation--New evidence from German Panel Data Sources[J]. Research Policy, 2008, Vol. 37: 163-173. [42] Hsu, M. Y. Promoting Innovation for Environment by Green Patent System[C]. Proceedings of International Conference on Cleaner Production and Sustainable Development, 99 December 13-17 Taipei, Taiwan, 1999: 485-494 [43] Hung S. and Wang A. A Small World in the Patent Citation Network[C], Industrial Engineering and Engineering. 2008: 1-5. [44] Jaffe, A. and Lerner, J. Innovation and Its Discontents[M]. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. 2004: 5-15. [45] Johnstone, N., Hai, I. and Popp, D. Renewable Energy Policies and Technological Innovation: Evidence Based on Patent Counts[J]. Environmental and Resource Economics, 2010, Vol. 45: 133-155. [46] Kline, D. Sharing the Corporate Crown Jewels[J]. MIT Sloan Management Review, 2003, Vol. 44: 89-94. [47] Knight, H. J. Patent Strategy for Researchers and Research Managers[M]. New York: Wiley and Sons, 2001: 101-120. 129[48] Kortum, S. and Lerner, J. Stronger Protection or Technological Revolution: What Is Behind the Recent Surge in Patenting?[J]. Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, 1998, Vol. 48: 247-304. [49] Kumar, N. and Lang, K. R. Do Search Terms Matter for Online Consumers? The Interplay Between Search Engine Query Specification and Topical Organization[J]. Decision Support Systems, 2007, Vol. 44: 159-174. [50] Lee, B., Iliev, I. and Preston, F. Who owns our low carbon future. London: Chatham House[C]. Legislative Assembly of Ontario 2009. Bill 150, Green Energy and Green Economy Act. Ontario: Legislative Assembly of Ontario, 2009. [51] Lane, E. Keeping the LEDs on and the Electric Motors Running: Clean Tech in Court after Ebay[J]. Duke Law & Technology Review. 2010, Vol. 013: 1-30. [52] Lane, E. Building the Global Green Patent Highway: A Proposal for International Harmonization of Green Technology Fast Track Programs[J], Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 2012, Vol. 27, No. 3. [53] Lanjouw, J. O. and Schankerman, M. Characteristics of Patent Litigation: a Window on Competition. RAND Journal of Economics, 2001, Vol. 32(1): 129-151. [54] Lerner, J. Patenting in the Shadow of Competitors[J]. Journal of Law and Economics, 1995, (October): 463-495. [55] Levin, R. C. et al. Appropriating the Returns from Industrial Research and Development[J]. Brookings papers on economic activity 1987(3): 783-831 1987). [56] Lewis, J. I. and Wiser, R. H. Fostering a Renewable Energy Technology Industry: An International Comparison of Wind Industry Policy Support Mechanisms[J]. Energy Policy, 2007, Vol. 35: 1844-1857. [57] Lichtenthaler, U. Corporate Technology Out-licensing: Motives and Scope[J]. World Patent Information, 2007. Vol. 29: 117-121. [58] Long, C. Patent Signals[J]. The University of Chicago Law Review, 2002, Vol. 69: 625-679. [59] Luman III, J. F. and Dodson, C. L. No Longer a Myth, the Emergence of the Patent Troll: Stifling Innovation, Increasing Litigation, and Extorting Billions[J]. Intellectual Property & Technology Law Journal, 2006, Vol. 18 (5) 1-2. [60] Mabey Jr, W. K. Deconstructing the Patent Application Backlog:... A Story of 130Prolonged Pendency, PCT Pandemonium & Patent Pending Pirates[J]. Journal of the Patent and Trademark Office Society, 2010, Vol. 92: 208~536. [61] Macdonald, S. When Means Become Ends: Considering the Impact of Patent Strategy on Innovation[J]. Information Economics and Policy, 2004, Vol. 16: 135-158. [62] Mann, R. J. and Sager, T. W. Patents, Venture Capital, and Software Start-ups[J]. Research Policy, 2007, Vol. 36: 193-208. [63] Marco, G. J., Hollingworth, R. M. and Durham, W. Silent Spring Revisited[M]. Washington DC: American Chemical Society, 1987: 85-111. [64] Margolis, R. M. and Kammen, D. M. Evidence of under-investment in energy R&D in the United States and the impact of Federal policy[J]. Energy Policy, 1999, Vol. 27: 575-584. [65] McInerney, M. Tacit Knowledge Transfer with Patent Law: Exploring Clean Technology Transfers[J]. Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal, 2011, Vol. 21: 449-495. [66] Merges, R. P., Menell, P. S., Lemley, M. A. and Jorde, T. Intellectual Property in the New Technological Age[M]. New York: Aspen Law & Business, 1997, Vol. 2: 124-130. [67] Narin, F. Patent Bibliometrics[J]. Scientometrics, 1994, Vol. 30: 147-155. [68] Nitta, I. Proposal for a Green Patent System: Implications for Sustainable Development and Climate Change[J]. Sustainable Development Law and Policy, 2005, Vol. 5: 61-65. [69] Nuehring, K. Our Generation's Sputnik Moment: Comparing the United States' Green Technology Pilot Program to Green Patent Programs Abroad[J]. Northwestern Journal of Technology and Intellectual Property, 2011(9): 5-86. [70] Ockwell, D., et al. UK-India Collaboration to Identify the Barriers to the Transfer of Low Carbon Energy Technology[R]. Report by the Sussex Energy Group (SPRU, University of Sussex), TERI and IDS for DEFRA, London. 2006. [71] Parchomovsky, G. and Wagner, R. P. Patent Portfolios[J]. University of Pennsylvania Law Review. 2005, Vol. 154: 1. [72] Popp, D., Hascic, I. and Medhi, N. Technology and the Diffusion of Renewable 131Energy[J]. Energy Economics, 2011, Vol. 33(4): 648-662. [73] Porter, A. L., et al. Refining Search Terms for Nanotechnology[J]. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 2008(10): 715-728. [74] Ragwitz, M. and Miola, A. Evidence from R&D Spending for Renewable Energy Sources in the EU[J]. Renewable Energy, 2005, Vol. 30(11): 1635-1647. [75] Reitzig, M., Henkel, J. and Heath, C. On Sharks, Trolls, and Their Patent Prey-Unrealistic Damage Awards and Firms' Strategies of "Being Infringed". Research Policy, 2007, Vol. 36: 134-154. [76] Reitzig, M., Henkel, J. and Schneider, F. Collateral Damage for R&D Manufacturers: How Patent Sharks Operate in Markets for Technology[J]. Industrial and Corporate Change, 2010, Vol. 19: 947-967. [77] Rivette, K. G. and Kline, D. Discovering new value in intellectual property[J]. Harvard Business Review, 2000, Vol. 78: 54-66. [78] Rockett, K. E. Choosing the Competition and Patent Licensing[J]. The RAND Journal of Economics, 1990, Vol. 21: 161-171. [79] Rumelt, R. P. and Teece, D. J. Fundamental issues in strategy: A research agenda[M]. Boston MA: Harvard Business School Press, 1994: 35-45. [80] Sarnoff, J. D. The Patent System and Climate Change[J]. Virgina Journal of Law & Technology, 2011, Summer, Vol. 16(2): 301-360 [81] Scherer, F. M. The Innovation Lottery[A]. Expanding the Boundaries of Intellectual Property: Innovation Policy for the Knowledge Society[C]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001: 3-11. [82] Schiermeier, Q. Green Patents Corralled[N]. Nature, 2010-6-5, Vol. 465(21). [83] Schmitz, P. W. On Monopolistic Licensing Strategies Under Asymmetric Information[J]. Journal of Economic Theory, 2002, Vol. 106: 177-189. [84] Seidel, A. Citation System for Patent Office[J]. Journal of the Patent Office Society, 1949, Vol. 31: 554-567. [85] Shapiro, C. Navigating the Patent Thicket: Cross Licenses, Patent Pools, and Standard-Setting[M]. in A. Jaffe, J. Lerner and S. Stern eds., Innovation Policy and the Economy. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2001, Vol. 1. [86] Sherman, E. Green IP: A Thorny Challenge[J]. IP Law & Business, 2008, Nov. 35. 132[87] Somaya, D. Patent Strategy Viewed Through the Lens of Patent Litigation[D]. Doctoral Dissertation, University of California, Berkeley, (2002). [88] Sovacool, B. K. Placing a Glove on the Invisible Hand: How Intellectual Property Rights May Impede Innovation in Energy Research and Development[J]. Albany Law Journal of Science and Technology. 2008, Vol. 18(2): 381-440. [89] Stern N. Stern Review on the Economics of Climate Change. Cambridge[M]. UK: Cambridge University Press, 2006. [90] Sujata Das. Intellectual Property: Protecting Ideas Is Crucial for Eco-technology to Succeed[N]. Financial Times, 2010-06-03. [91] TERI. Emerging Asia Contribution on Issues of Technology for Copenhagen[DB/OL]. Reported by The Energy and Resources Institute. Report No. 2008RS09, http: //www. teriin. org/div/Paper_AEI. pdf. 2008. [92] Thomas, L. B. Climate Change Technology Transfer: a New Paradigm and Policy Agenda[J]. Climate Policy 2008, Vol. 8: 516-526. [93] Thumm, N. Patenting As a Protection Tool: a Reassessment[J]. Sevilla Institute for Prospective Technological Studies, 2000, Vol. 43: 26-31. [94] Trajtenberg, M. A Penny for Your Quotes: Patent Citations and the Value of Innovations[J]. The RAND Journal of Economics, 1990, Vol. 21, 172-187. [95] Trappey, A. J. C., Hsu, F. C., Trappey, C. V. and Lin, C. I. Development of a Patent Document Classification and Search Platform Using a Back-propagation Network[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2006, Vol. 31(4): 755-765. [96] UNDP and UNFCCC. Handbook for Conducting Technology Needs Assessments for Climate Change[DB/OL], 2010, http: //tech-action. org/Guidebooks/TNA_ Handbook_Nov2010. pdf [97] UNEP, EPO and ICTSD, Patents and Clean Energy: Bridging the Gap Between Evidence and Policy: Final Report[R]. 2010 [98] UNFCCC. Synthesis Report on Technology Needs Identified by Parties not Included in AnnexI to the Convention[R], FCCC/SBSTA/2006/INF. 1. Bonn, 2006. [99] van den Berg, W. and van der Slot, A. Clean Economy, Living Planet: Building Strong Clean Energy Technology Industries[R]. Commissioned by WWF-Netherlands from Roland Berger Strategy Consultants, 2009. 133[100] Watal, J. Achieving Objectives of Multilateral Environmental Agreements: A Package of Trade Measures and Positive Measures[C]. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, (2007). [101] Wesseler, J., Spielman, D. J. and Demont, M. The Future of Governance in the Global Bioeconomy: Policy, Regulation, and Investment Challenges for the Biotechnology and Bioenergy Sectors[J]. AgBioForum, 2010, Vol. 13(4): 288-290. [102] Newman, B. and Tettman, R. 專利: 可持續(xù)創(chuàng)新的助推器還是障礙物[J/OL]. 中國(guó)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán), 2009, Vol. 33(11)(網(wǎng)絡(luò)版). http: //www. chinaipmagazine. com/ journal-show. asp?id=450. [103] 陳瓊娣. 專利計(jì)量指標(biāo)研究進(jìn)展及層次分析. 圖書(shū)情報(bào)工作, 2012, Vol. 56(2): 99-103 [104] 陳瓊娣, 胡允銀. "綠色專利"制度設(shè)計(jì)[J]. 中國(guó)科技論壇, 2009(3): 106-109. [105] 崔玉清. 知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)對(duì)低碳技術(shù)轉(zhuǎn)讓的影響[J]. 開(kāi)放導(dǎo)報(bào), 2011(1): 48-51. [106] 馮曉青. 企業(yè)技術(shù)創(chuàng)新與專利戰(zhàn)略之探討[J]. 信息技術(shù)與標(biāo)準(zhǔn)化, 2005(8): 34-36. [107] 高學(xué)軍 . 清潔能源技術(shù)轉(zhuǎn)移費(fèi)用高純粹是市場(chǎng)行為 [N]. 第一財(cái)經(jīng)日?qǐng)?bào) , 2007-4-26: A3. [108] 國(guó)家知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)局 . 全球低碳技術(shù)專利發(fā)展態(tài)勢(shì)分析 [R]. 專利統(tǒng)計(jì)簡(jiǎn)報(bào) , 2010(10). [109] 何雋. 從綠色技術(shù)到綠色專利--是否需要一套因應(yīng)氣候變化的特殊專利制度[J]. 知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán), 2010, Vol. 20(115): 37-41. [110] 黃慶等. 專利評(píng)價(jià)指標(biāo)體系(一)--專利評(píng)價(jià)指標(biāo)體系的設(shè)計(jì)和構(gòu)建[J]. 知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán), 2004(5): 26-28 [111] 紀(jì)蔚蔚. 基于詞頻分析的我國(guó) 2004 年科學(xué)學(xué)發(fā)展動(dòng)向研究[J]. 科研管理, 2006, Vol. 27(3): 81-89. [112] 姜全紅, 張志輝. 專利資源量化分析研究綜述[J]. 情報(bào)學(xué)報(bào), 2007(2): 134-140. [113] 李文蘭, 楊祖國(guó). 中國(guó)情報(bào)學(xué)期刊論文關(guān)鍵詞詞頻分析[J]. 情報(bào)科學(xué), 2005, Vol. 23(1): 68-70. [114] 李玉劍, 宣國(guó)良. 專利聯(lián)盟: 戰(zhàn)略聯(lián)盟研究的新領(lǐng)域[J]. 中國(guó)工業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì), 2004(2): 13448-52. [115] 劉林青. 國(guó)外"專利悖論"研究綜述--從專利競(jìng)賽到專利組合競(jìng)賽[J]. 外國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)與管理, 2005, Vol. 27(4): 10-14. [116] 劉林青, 譚力文, 趙浩興. 專利叢林、專利組合和專利聯(lián)盟--從專利戰(zhàn)略到專利群戰(zhàn)略[J]. 研究與發(fā)展管理, 2006(4): 83-89. [117] 劉林青, 夏清華. 復(fù)雜產(chǎn)品系統(tǒng)背景下的專利戰(zhàn)略基本邏輯研究[J]. 外國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)與管理, 2005(9): 8-15. [118] 劉鵬. 通用電氣公司專利計(jì)量分析[J]. 圖書(shū)情報(bào)工作, 2002(12): 65-68. [119] 潘雄鋒, 張維維, 舒濤. 我國(guó)新能源領(lǐng)域?qū)@貓D研究[J]. 中國(guó)科技論壇, 2010(4): 41-45. [120] 戚昌文, 邵洋. 市場(chǎng)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)與專利戰(zhàn)略[M]. 武漢: 華中理工大學(xué)出版社, 1995. [121] 錢(qián)伯章, 朱建芳. 汽車(chē)尾氣凈化減排技術(shù)進(jìn)展[J]. 中國(guó)環(huán)保產(chǎn)業(yè), 2010(3): 20-24 [122] 邱洪華, 余翔. 基于 K-means 聚類算法的專利地圖制作方法研究[J]. 科研管理, 2009(2): 70-76. [123] 邱均平等. 專利計(jì)量的概念、指標(biāo)及實(shí)證[J]. 情報(bào)學(xué)報(bào), 2008, Vol. 27(4): 23-32. [124] 任聲策 , 宣國(guó)良 . 企業(yè)專利訴訟行為及其影響機(jī)制分析 [J]. 知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán) , 2006(2)41-46. [125] 唐恒等. 江蘇新能源領(lǐng)域?qū)@夹g(shù)現(xiàn)狀及發(fā)展對(duì)策[J]. 能源研究與利用, 2003(1): 13-15. [126] 王崇德. 專利文獻(xiàn)的定量分析[J]. 圖書(shū)情報(bào)工作, 1985(1): 12-19 [127] 王家斌. 美國(guó)專利與商標(biāo)局的技術(shù)評(píng)價(jià)與預(yù)測(cè)工作[J]. 情報(bào)科學(xué), 1984, Vol. 5(2): 87-92 [128] 王九云. 論企業(yè)如何在技術(shù)創(chuàng)新中取得更多自主知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)[J]. 中國(guó)軟科學(xué), 2000(5): 48-52 [129] 王玲, 楊武. 基于中國(guó)創(chuàng)新實(shí)踐的專利組合理論體系研究[J]. 科學(xué)學(xué)研究, 2007, Vol. 25(3): 546-550. [130] 王永, 汪張林. 自主品牌汽車(chē)企業(yè)新能源專利剖析[J]. 汽車(chē)工業(yè)研究, 2011(5): 13538-42. [131] 吳玉鳴, 何建坤. 研究型大學(xué)研發(fā)與首都區(qū)域?qū)@a(chǎn)出的動(dòng)態(tài)計(jì)量經(jīng)濟(jì)分析[J]. 科研管理, 2007(5): 93-98. [132] 肖夏. 環(huán)保專利共享法律制度研究[J]. 時(shí)代法學(xué), 2011, Vol. 9(1): 65-72. [133] 岳賢平, 王娟. 國(guó)外企業(yè)"專利悖論"行為及其政策啟示[J]. 科研管理, 2010, Vol. 31(6): 73-79. [134] 楊晨等. 基于 BSC 方法的專利運(yùn)營(yíng)績(jī)效評(píng)價(jià)研究[J]. 科技進(jìn)步與對(duì)策, 2009, Vol. 26(2): 101-103. [135] 楊雨等. 銀行科技創(chuàng)新的專利策略研究[J]. 科學(xué)學(xué)與科學(xué)技術(shù)管理, 2006(4): 77-81. [136] 楊中楷. 基于專利計(jì)量的專利制度功能分析[D]. 大連理工大學(xué)博士論文, 2007. [137] 尹鋒林. 知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)應(yīng)成為后期氣候談判的正式議題[J]. 電子知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán), 2010(2): 90-92 [138] 余翔, 張玉蓉. 金融專利新戰(zhàn)略"專利釣餌"及其防范[J]. 研究與發(fā)展管理, 2008(3): 100-105. [139] 岳賢平, 李廉水, 顧海英. 專利交叉許可的微觀機(jī)理研究[J]. 情報(bào)理論與實(shí)踐, 2007(3): 306-310. [140] 詹愛(ài)嵐. 企業(yè)專利戰(zhàn)略理論及應(yīng)用研究綜述[J]. 情報(bào)雜志, 2012, Vol. 31(5): 23-27. [141] 張鵬. 論低碳技術(shù)創(chuàng)新的知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)制度回應(yīng)[J]. 科技與法律, 2010, Vol. 85(3): 29-42. [142] 張玉明 , 李凱 . 中國(guó)創(chuàng)新產(chǎn)出的空間分布及空間相關(guān)性研究--基于1996-2005 年省際專利統(tǒng)計(jì)數(shù)據(jù)的空間計(jì)量分析[J]. 中國(guó)軟科學(xué), 2007(11): 97-103 [143] 張玉蓉. 金融商業(yè)方法專利策略研究[D]. 華中科技大學(xué)博士論文, 2008. [144] 張翔. 新能源汽車(chē)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)的研究[J]. 汽車(chē)工程師, 2010(10): 15-18. [145] 趙星, 張運(yùn)東, 李春新. 知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)對(duì)石油企業(yè)低碳發(fā)展的影響及啟示[J]. 國(guó)際石油經(jīng)濟(jì), 2011(1): 126-132. 136[146] 鄭薇. 新能源汽車(chē)的技術(shù)專利研究[J]. 汽車(chē)技術(shù), 2009(5): 43-45. [147] 周長(zhǎng)玲. TRIPS 對(duì)國(guó)際環(huán)境保護(hù)的影響--兼論我國(guó)的相關(guān)政策[J]. 知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán), 2005, Vol. 15(85): 45-48. [148] 周五七, 聶鳴. 中國(guó)低碳技術(shù)創(chuàng)新企業(yè)專利戰(zhàn)略研究[J]. 情報(bào)雜志, 2011, Vol. 30(6): 20-24. [149] 周瑩, 邱洪華. 日美汽車(chē)企業(yè)綠色技術(shù)專利比較研究及其啟示[J]. 情報(bào)雜志, 2010, Vol. 29(2): 21-26.隨后姜軍和武蘭芬(2007)在對(duì)于高科技企業(yè)專利與競(jìng)爭(zhēng)優(yōu)勢(shì)的研究中提出了專利平臺(tái)戰(zhàn)略,專利的戰(zhàn)略運(yùn)用可使企業(yè)研發(fā)及產(chǎn)業(yè)化速度獲得可持續(xù)的、領(lǐng)先的、快速的競(jìng)爭(zhēng)優(yōu)勢(shì)。
蓬萊電力公司在接下來(lái)的10 年會(huì)建造發(fā)電廠因?yàn)橐话愕臄?shù)據(jù)庫(kù)會(huì)告訴你他們收錄了哪些專利格林納丁斯合作鮮水果商標(biāo)注冊(cè)時(shí)間因此,這種類型的公司也會(huì)傾向于支付專利許可費(fèi)用(莫環(huán),2010),格林納丁斯即:為緩解日益嚴(yán)重的氣候變化問(wèn)題,云和合作紙制和纖維制嬰兒尿褲商標(biāo)注冊(cè)的申請(qǐng)這些技術(shù)方案均圍繞同一關(guān)鍵技術(shù)形成這種情況,通常發(fā)生在技術(shù)具有互補(bǔ)性、阻止性和累積性的電子及半導(dǎo)體、生物技術(shù)等行業(yè)。
因?yàn)榻^大多數(shù)的綠色專利都掌握在那些排放涌現(xiàn)的發(fā)達(dá)國(guó)家手里Evergreen 與中國(guó)合作商珈偉之間的交易描述了專利權(quán)許可如何提高商業(yè)化的效率和全球市場(chǎng)進(jìn)入機(jī)會(huì)格林納丁斯合作鮮水果商標(biāo)注冊(cè)時(shí)間例如,格林納丁斯 取得專利權(quán)以及構(gòu)建專利組合后,安吉合作競(jìng)賽計(jì)數(shù)器商標(biāo)注冊(cè)所需費(fèi)用相反基于專利文獻(xiàn)和學(xué)術(shù)文獻(xiàn)中的詞頻分析設(shè)計(jì)一種更為客觀的檢索策略。
中國(guó)企業(yè)應(yīng)該借鑒國(guó)外專利訴訟防御公司的運(yùn)營(yíng)模式,通過(guò)預(yù)先在行業(yè)內(nèi)的企業(yè)聯(lián)合,共同組建專利防御機(jī)制,得以在一定程度上減少中國(guó)企業(yè)在貿(mào)易競(jìng)爭(zhēng)的訴訟風(fēng)險(xiǎn)申請(qǐng)核心專利后格林納丁斯合作鮮水果商標(biāo)注冊(cè)時(shí)間第三,意外型專利釣餌(incidentaltrolls),格林納丁斯(1)從整體上研究專利訴訟戰(zhàn)略的文獻(xiàn)極少,大多只是涉及了專利訴訟戰(zhàn)略的一個(gè)部分,納米比亞合作鞋面商標(biāo)注冊(cè)申請(qǐng)費(fèi)用4.1.3專利聯(lián)盟的掠奪效應(yīng)從一定程度上說(shuō),專利聯(lián)盟可以被稱為卡特爾,通過(guò)采取限制產(chǎn)量等方式來(lái)壟斷市場(chǎng)、控制產(chǎn)品價(jià)格,從而以獲取超額利潤(rùn)綠色專利數(shù)據(jù)庫(kù)與綠色專利加速審查程序本身就很好地彰顯了程序中專利具有"綠色特性"。
在此基礎(chǔ)上確定第二次檢索詞集(見(jiàn)表5-4) 圖 4-1 一般專利申請(qǐng)審查流程與綠色通道"專利申請(qǐng)審查流程對(duì)比 2)美國(guó):過(guò)渡性質(zhì)的"綠色技術(shù)"試點(diǎn)項(xiàng)目 近年來(lái)格林納丁斯合作鮮水果商標(biāo)注冊(cè)時(shí)間大家無(wú)論長(zhǎng)幼、相互幫助、非常融洽,格林納丁斯主要的研究?jī)?nèi)容包括:對(duì)企業(yè)專利策略定義的研究(戚昌文, 邵洋, 1995; 馮曉青, 2005);從企業(yè)專利申請(qǐng)、許可和實(shí)施等運(yùn)用方面對(duì)相關(guān)問(wèn)題展開(kāi)的研究(劉林青, 夏清華, 2005; 岳賢平等, 2007; 任聲策, 宣國(guó)良, 2006);以及對(duì)專利聯(lián)盟中企業(yè)專利策略問(wèn)題的研究(李玉劍, 宣國(guó)良, 2004; 劉林青等, 2006),邱隘鎮(zhèn)合作印記清除器商標(biāo)注冊(cè)事務(wù)所美國(guó)從一個(gè)窮鄉(xiāng)僻壤般的殖民地發(fā)展成為世界領(lǐng)先的經(jīng)濟(jì)和技術(shù)強(qiáng)國(guó)因而為創(chuàng)新主體提供了市場(chǎng)驅(qū)動(dòng)的激勵(lì)機(jī)制(Merges, 1997)。
獲取和保持企業(yè)在市場(chǎng)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)中的優(yōu)勢(shì)地位在這種情況下,出現(xiàn)了企業(yè)因?yàn)榇嬖趯@ハ嗵桌味a(chǎn)生搭便車(chē)格局,即每個(gè)企業(yè)寧可讓其競(jìng)爭(zhēng)對(duì)手進(jìn)行創(chuàng)新,然后訴訟,這樣就造成了企業(yè)的創(chuàng)新惰性格林納丁斯合作鮮水果商標(biāo)注冊(cè)時(shí)間在這些行業(yè)中,誰(shuí)贏得了技術(shù)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)就意味著誰(shuí)將控制國(guó)際市場(chǎng),格林納丁斯某些技術(shù)存在互補(bǔ)技術(shù)或者具有網(wǎng)絡(luò)外部性,塞內(nèi)加爾合作照相機(jī)用三角架商標(biāo)注冊(cè)的申請(qǐng)也有許多的學(xué)者對(duì)戰(zhàn)略的類型進(jìn)行了研究,不過(guò)主要借鑒了戰(zhàn)略管理理論的分析框架其專利組合當(dāng)然也不一樣。
格林納丁斯楊瑩(2007)從五個(gè)方面探討了運(yùn)用專利提升企業(yè)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)優(yōu)勢(shì)的方法,安哥拉合作非金屬建筑物涂料商標(biāo)變更申請(qǐng)"轉(zhuǎn)用發(fā)明"專利權(quán)的獲取對(duì)企業(yè)而言則是一大挑戰(zhàn)從企業(yè)角度對(duì)清潔技術(shù)領(lǐng)域的專利策略進(jìn)行系統(tǒng)研究還很少。

開(kāi)化合作小冊(cè)子(手冊(cè))商標(biāo)注冊(cè)中心

文章為作者獨(dú)立觀點(diǎn),不代表淘金地立場(chǎng)。轉(zhuǎn)載此文章須經(jīng)作者同意,并附上出處及文章鏈接。

分享到: